This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piet Beertema
Piet.Beertema at cwi.nl
Thu Oct 21 14:07:01 CEST 2004
>> Which is short-sighted. What's the use of blocking only *existing* >> ccTLD codes, when nobody can foresee what new ccTLD codes may come >> to exist in the future? We've seen enough recent examples... > >Okay, so block all two and three-letter SLDs, under the assumption that >if they aren't already valid TLDs, they might become valid TLDs in the >future. That would cause problems for ibm.eu, but would guarantee that >you can prevent .com.eu from being registered (as one example). I wouldn't go that far. I would block all 2-letter codes and the "historical" 3-letter codes. After all there's no rule for (new) generic TLD's. Piet
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]