[dns-wg] Policy for Reverse DNS for End-User PA Addresses?

> My personal opinion is that a mandatory policy is likely to be too

Mandating these things usually needs a hat the wg doesn't wear.
See also draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-05.txt.

> cumbersome. It could also be painful for ISPs and the NCC: creating
> inetnum objects for every /29 or whatever an ISP gives to its DSL
> customers. That might also open the door to other complications. If

Yes, like privacy issues.

> some DSL user is in the NCC database because of an inetnum object for
> reverse delegation, maybe that user should be paying NCC fees? And does

Well, does the recipient of assigned address space now (directly) pay an NCC
fee?

> about reverse delegations which customers can put in front of their
> ISP would be no bad thing though.

What I've read between the lines is that in the case of DSL the classless
delegation method may not be sufficient, even if the ISP is able and willing.
Due to dynamic nature of address assignments they'd need something similar
to dyndns (and friends) for the reverse mapping. So, is anyone doing this
already?

-Peter