This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] lameness and unreachability
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] lameness and unreachability
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] lameness and unreachability
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at cisco.com
Sun May 25 07:56:25 CEST 2003
On lördag, maj 24, 2003, at 22:21 Europe/Stockholm, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 5:52 PM +0200 2003/05/24, Patrik Fältström wrote: > >> - Look up all A records for each MX >> - Look up all IP addresses for each A >> - Try to connect to port 25 for every A (every A must respond, but >> only >> one IP address per A) > > A records *are* IP addresses. Do you mean reverse lookups? Grrr....it was very much evening when I wrote it. The above doesn't make sense. What I do is: (1) Query for all MX records, and get back domain names (2) Query for all A records for every domain name (3) Try to connect to port 25 for every domain name one have I.e. "look up all A records for each MX" means "gather all domain names from all MX records". Yes, I know it didn't make any sense. Sorry. The code is available at http://dnscheck.paf.se/ paf
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] lameness and unreachability
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] lameness and unreachability
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]