This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] lameness and unreachability
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] lameness and unreachability
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
Jim.Reid at nominum.com
Sat May 24 12:30:18 CEST 2003
>>>>> "Ed" == Edward Lewis <edlewis at arin.net> writes: Ed> Peter mentioned that there is a RIPE document behind this. I Ed> wasn't aware of that. (As an aside, there was a short post Ed> meeting discussion about where would we publish operations Ed> documents - as in within what venue?) The same place as all other RIPE documents? Or am I missing something? To my mind, the DNS WG should produce this document and publish it in the usual way. Though if somewhere like NANOG or IETF would be more appropriate, that's fine by me.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] lameness and unreachability
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]