This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
A work item?
- Previous message (by thread): A work item?
- Next message (by thread): A work item?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bruce Campbell
bruce.campbell at apnic.net
Tue Mar 13 10:02:23 CET 2001
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Mally Mclane wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > > > Do any ISPs or web hosting companies have publically available > > > statements on their web sites stating that they will not support the > > > new new.net domains and why they won't? I am getting more requests > > > from users to change our DNS root servers to support this and wanted > > > to see what others tell their users. Any IETF/ICANN statement > > > available? A brief Google search produces the following (fairly concise and hefty) document: http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann.pdf > Speaking from my experience, the new.net idea has been rubbished both on > uknot (a list which consists of a lot of the UK Internet Industry > movers'n'shakers) and ecdiscuss, it's also been rubbished a lot in the > press. It comes down to - alternative roots break the accepted consistency of the existing hierarchial DNS structure. Unfortunately, there are many crackpots (yes, we get a few who perceive that APNIC has a slightly different role than it does) who take a lot of explaining in order to get the above simple idea through their heads ;) --==-- Bruce. Speaking for myself.
- Previous message (by thread): A work item?
- Next message (by thread): A work item?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]