This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
A work item?
- Previous message (by thread): A work item?
- Next message (by thread): A work item?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Mar 13 09:49:04 CET 2001
Apparently a misunderstanding. I meant work in the sense of Hank's message, e.g. raising awareness that this is wubbish. At 09:44 AM 13.3.01, Mally Mclane wrote: >On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > >> > >> >Do any ISPs or web hosting companies have publically available statements on their web sites stating that they will not support the new new.net domains and why they won't? I am getting more requests from users to change our DNS root servers to support this and wanted to see what others tell their users. Any IETF/ICANN statement available? >> > > >Speaking from my experience, the new.net idea has been rubbished both on >uknot (a list which consists of a lot of the UK Internet Industry >movers'n'shakers) and ecdiscuss, it's also been rubbished a lot in the >press. > >I wouldn't advise anyone to start reconfiguring their nameservers. Just be >patient and wait for ICANN ;) > > >Regards, > > >Mally Mclane
- Previous message (by thread): A work item?
- Next message (by thread): A work item?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]