This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Keith Mitchell
keith at smoti.org
Tue Aug 6 17:11:13 CEST 2019
The function is very different, but the concept of a neutral, stable, respected panel of volunteers serving the community's interests is not so different from the existing arrangements for the RIPE NCC Arbiters' panel. It might be worth a look at the relevant documents in case there's anything in there that could be incorporated to save effort defining processes/structure, to make the CoC Team parameters more "RIPE-like", and/or that might otherwise be overlooked. Keith On 8/5/19 8:15 AM, Amanda Gowland wrote: > Please find attached a draft proposal for the CoC Team: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yqOUPR02SONuSt812cuOBkk_xnhjYzjdk9qmsJkcDdQ/edit?usp=sharing > > I used Sasha's draft as the framework for the doc, just > adding/editing where necessary. > > There are some to-be-determined factors, mainly: > > - How long should a term be for volunteers?> - How many people (minimum, maximum) should we aim for?> - What is the time-frame for response (e.g. how long would a reporter need to wait for a > confirmation of receipt from the team?) > > Please add your comments. > > Kind regards, > > Amanda
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]