[db-wg] Where are we with NWIs?

Hi Nick

On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 16:41, Nick Hilliard via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
>
>
> the job of a chair is to ensure that the business of the forum is done,
> in an orderly and efficient way.

Where is this stated?

>  From this point of view, an "active"
> chair is good, and to be welcomed.  What isn't ok is when a chair
> decides to take a specific point of view and actively engages on an
> issue, on one side or another.

Where is it stated that a chair can't take a specific point of view
during a discussion? Maybe a chair takes a point of view in order to
elicit further details from those involved in a discussion on that
point.

>
> This isn't a "one or two vocal members" thing either.  There is
> extensive and long standing good practice documented in relation to what
> duties and responsibilities a chair has,

Please point me to this extensive documentation?

> and unanimously, this good
> practice mandates neutrality on the part of the chair.

Again, point me to the documentation that states that all co-chairs
must be neutral in any discussion?

There are a couple of documents on chairs responsibilities:
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-692
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-765
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-764

Please tell me which part of any of these docs I am not complying with.

cheers
denis
co-chair DB-WG


>
> Nick
>
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/