[db-wg] WG Co-Chairs Tasks (was: Where are we with NWIs?)

{change the topic. focus: basic tasks}
Dear RIPE DB-WG,
Hope this email finds you in good health.
Please see my comments below inline...
Thanks.

Le mercredi 19 juillet 2023, denis walker via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> a
écrit :

> Colleagues
>
> One or two vocal members of this community frequently express their
> opinion that all WG chairs should sit silently in the background, post an
> occasional review and wait to declare consensus or not.


>
Hi Denis,
Thanks for your email, brother.

...you seem to disagree with the WG consensus :-)
or it's just with those few "vocal" WG participants?

Do seek, first, if there is any rough consensus, or
not, please.
Is there actually any consensus on the matter?


>
> I am always willing to try out ideas from the community.


>
That's not part of the tasks of Co-Chairs, imho :-/
...i may be wrong, though.

Again! you *must* ask to the WG participants if
they are ok with that idea, first...prior to engage
on disruptive behavior.


> So for the last couple of months, since RIPE 86, I have stayed silent on
> DB matters.
>
>
Please, it's not about you, brother.

If you push back to the WG, you would be less
concerned about your WG participant's opinions.

In what, as a Co-chair, shall you be concerned
about your WG's participant opinions? Please
think of it twice, brother...if you care much; then
how could you act fairly? or in other words: Do
you expect your WG participants to hope to get
a fair process, at end?




> How has the conversation been on NWIs?
>
>
Which one?
Is it into the Co-chair's tasks list to follow-up on
the active NWIs progress?



>
> Oh there hasn't been any.
>
>
This WG have three Co-chairs, may i suggest to our
Co-chairs to:

1] organise their team;
2] identify their *willing* regular tasks list;
3] discuss it with the DB-WG;
4] distribute the resulting regular tasks list amongst
them (Co-chairs)
5] bind on that.



>
> How have they progressed beyond some steps already in progress?
> Oh there hasn't been any.
> Are we any closer to completing action on most NWIs?
> Er no we aren't.
>
>
Please, do not justify a disruptive behavior by stats
 poured like that. It *should* not work that way,
brother:

1| remove your hat first
2| voice your personal opinion
3| wait the other Co-chairs to seek any consensus
4| put back your Co-chair's hat
5| and go ahead.

That's, imho, what Randy is trying to recommend,
 if i got it well.


>
> So I think it is fair to say this is not an appropriate way of working
> with some WGs these days.


>
The DB-WG may be an exception, but how to deal
 with that difference?

Revisit the Co-chair's tasks list?
What else?


>
> I will now go back to my previous way of working where, as a co-chair, I
> do have an agenda - to get things done,


>
Please read my previous comments :-)

Yes to "Get Things Done"!

No to handle "Things" without rough consensus!
Yes to do any-"Thing " with "no hat"!


>
> for the good of the internet.


>
We have already experienced that before and we
know that the "good of the Internet" is a matter
of collaborative engagement of any stakeholders
available.

...but! don't get me wrong, please: i have no doubt
on your sincerity or capacity to act as fairly as it
would be possible.

Note that those who would come after you would
also benefit to whatever disruption we would have
 agreed on now. Imagine, then, some really bad
actor with own hidden *agenda* taking the position
 after you...what would be the safeguards?

...i stop here, while thinking to have said enough on
 this topic.

By the way! i personally appreciate the fondamental
 values and expertise of Denis and i hope we would
 be able to get more benefit on his presence on this WG.

Shalom,
--sb.



> Whether you consider that a 'personal' or 'professional' or 'DB' agenda is
> up to you. Just to be clear, this is not the same as for the good of
> 'operators'. There are many stakeholder groups in this community now. We
> are no longer just
> 'the operator community' or even 'the technical community'.
>
> So I will continue to engage with the community, push out ideas (even
> crazy ideas sometimes), start and drive conversations until we get
> resolutions. Incidentally, this quiet period since RIPE 86 does remind
> us how busy you all are and how difficult it is for you to find the
> time to get so involved with the fine detail of small technical and
> operational changes to the RIPE Database. Which does fit with the
> presentation I did at RIPE 86 on how to manage the RIPE Database. I
> will come back to that shortly.
>
> cheers
> denis
> co-chair DB-WG
>
> --
> [...]



-- 

Best Regards !
__
baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure>
Subscribe to Mailing List: <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
__
#‎LASAINTEBIBLE‬|#‎Romains15‬:33«Que LE ‪#‎DIEU‬ de ‪#‎Paix‬ soit avec vous
tous! ‪#‎Amen‬!»
‪#‎MaPrière‬ est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement‬
«Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire
après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20230720/4aae7ebc/attachment-0001.html>