{change the topic. focus: basic tasks}<div>Dear RIPE DB-WG,<div>Hope this email finds you in good health.</div><div>Please see my comments below inline...</div><div>Thanks.<br><br>Le mercredi 19 juillet 2023, denis walker via db-wg <<a href="mailto:db-wg@ripe.net" target="_blank">db-wg@ripe.net</a>> a écrit :<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Colleagues<br>
<br>
One or two vocal members of this community frequently express their opinion that all WG chairs should sit silently in the background, post an occasional review and wait to declare consensus or not. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi Denis,</div><div>Thanks for your email, brother.</div><div><br></div><div>...you seem to disagree with the WG consensus :-)</div><div>or it's just with those few "vocal" WG participants?</div><div><br></div><div>Do seek, first, if there is any rough consensus, or </div><div>not, please.</div><div>Is there actually any consensus on the matter?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I am always willing to try out ideas from the community. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's not part of the tasks of Co-Chairs, imho :-/</div><div>...i may be wrong, though.</div><div><br></div><div>Again! you *must* ask to the WG participants if </div><div>they are ok with that idea, first...prior to engage </div><div>on disruptive behavior.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">So for the last couple of months, since RIPE 86, I have stayed silent on DB matters.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Please, it's not about you, brother.</div><div><br></div><div>If you push back to the WG, you would be less </div><div>concerned about your WG participant's opinions.</div><div><br></div><div>In what, as a Co-chair, shall you be concerned </div><div>about your WG's participant opinions? Please </div><div>think of it twice, brother...if you care much; then </div><div>how could you act fairly? or in other words: Do </div><div>you expect your WG participants to hope to get</div><div>a fair process, at end?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
How has the conversation been on NWIs?<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Which one?</div><div>Is it into the Co-chair's tasks list to follow-up on </div><div>the active NWIs progress?</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Oh there hasn't been any.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>This WG have three Co-chairs, may i suggest to our</div></div><div>Co-chairs to:</div><div><br></div><div>1] organise their team;</div><div>2] identify their *willing* regular tasks list;</div><div>3] discuss it with the DB-WG;</div><div>4] distribute the resulting regular tasks list amongst</div><div>them (Co-chairs)</div><div>5] bind on that.</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
How have they progressed beyond some steps already in progress?<br>
Oh there hasn't been any.<br>
Are we any closer to completing action on most NWIs?<br>
Er no we aren't.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Please, do not justify a disruptive behavior by stats</div><div> poured like that. It *should* not work that way, </div><div>brother:</div><div> </div><div>1| remove your hat first</div><div>2| voice your personal opinion</div><div>3| wait the other Co-chairs to seek any consensus</div><div>4| put back your Co-chair's hat</div><div>5| and go ahead.</div><div><br></div><div>That's, imho, what Randy is trying to recommend,</div><div> if i got it well.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
So I think it is fair to say this is not an appropriate way of working with some WGs these days. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The DB-WG may be an exception, but how to deal</div><div> with that difference?</div><div><br></div><div>Revisit the Co-chair's tasks list?</div><div>What else?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I will now go back to my previous way of working where, as a co-chair, I do have an agenda - to get things done, </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Please read my previous comments :-)</div><div><br></div><div>Yes to "Get Things Done"!</div><div><br></div><div>No to handle "Things" without rough consensus!</div><div>Yes to do any-"Thing " with "no hat"!</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">for the good of the internet. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><div> </div><div>We have already experienced that before and we </div><div>know that the "good of the Internet" is a matter </div><div>of collaborative engagement of any stakeholders </div><div>available.</div><div><br></div><div>...but! don't get me wrong, please: i have no doubt </div><div>on your sincerity or capacity to act as fairly as it </div><div>would be possible.</div><div><br></div><div>Note that those who would come after you would </div><div>also benefit to whatever disruption we would have</div><div> agreed on now. Imagine, then, some really bad </div><div>actor with own hidden *agenda* taking the position</div><div> after you...what would be the safeguards?</div><div><br></div><div>...i stop here, while thinking to have said enough on</div><div> this topic.</div><div><br></div><div>By the way! i personally appreciate the fondamental</div><div> values and expertise of Denis and i hope we would</div><div> be able to get more benefit on his presence on this WG.</div><div><br></div><div>Shalom,</div><div>--sb.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Whether you consider that a 'personal' or 'professional' or 'DB' agenda is up to you. Just to be clear, this is not the same as for the good of 'operators'. There are many stakeholder groups in this community now. We are no longer just<br>
'the operator community' or even 'the technical community'.<br>
<br>
So I will continue to engage with the community, push out ideas (even<br>
crazy ideas sometimes), start and drive conversations until we get<br>
resolutions. Incidentally, this quiet period since RIPE 86 does remind<br>
us how busy you all are and how difficult it is for you to find the<br>
time to get so involved with the fine detail of small technical and<br>
operational changes to the RIPE Database. Which does fit with the<br>
presentation I did at RIPE 86 on how to manage the RIPE Database. I<br>
will come back to that shortly.<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
denis<br>
co-chair DB-WG<br>
<br>
-- <br>[...]</blockquote></div></div>
<br><br>-- <br><p>Best Regards !<br>__<br>baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<<a href="https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure">https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure</a>><br>Subscribe to Mailing List: <<a href="https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/">https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/</a>><br>__<br>#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!»<br>#MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement<br>«Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2)<br><br></p>