This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] ORGANISATION country code
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Performance Evaluation 2022
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORGANISATION country code
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis walker
ripedenis at gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 14:02:50 CET 2023
Colleagues We have a number of outstanding issues from RIPE 85 so let's start with NWI-10. Ed said in his update, "Country code is now editable in organisations without co-maintained resources" I think this is a really bad idea. The country codes entered into ORGANISATION objects by the RIPE NCC are well defined, verified and maintained by the RIPE NCC. If we allow users to edit this field in other ORGANISATION objects, the values they enter will be undefined, unverified and meaningless. Just like the country code in resource objects. I don't think we should allow more meaningless data to be added to the RIPE Database. Even worse, we are mixing well defined data with meaningless data in the same attribute in the same object. This will end up with some people trusting all of this data and some people not trusting any of it...confusion. I suggest we don't allow users to enter any data into this attribute and remove any data that may have already been entered. If there is a need for resource holders to enter a country code in ORGANISATION objects set up for end users, then let's define a specific attribute for that with a well defined meaning. Your thoughts are welcome... cheers denis co-chair DB-WG
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Performance Evaluation 2022
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORGANISATION country code
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]