This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] 2022-01 New Version Policy Proposal (Personal Data in the RIPE Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] 2022-01 New Version Policy Proposal (Personal Data in the RIPE Database)
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] 2022-01 V2 Resource Holders Address
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sylvain Baya
abscoco at gmail.com
Wed Jun 22 05:40:56 CEST 2022
Dear DB-WG, Hoping that this email finds you in good health! Please find my comments below, inline... Le lundi 20 juin 2022, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> a écrit : > In message <CAKvLzuFA0y8mOzPiiy4tHBCRUNUBbQgJc-DD54E-S+0TW=StiA at mail. > gmail.com> > denis walker <ripedenis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> [...] > > > >> What gives you or anyone the right to take away a member's rights to > have > >> their true and actual mailing address in their own public WHOIS records? > > > >Again you simply don't understand the issue. "their true and actual". This > >address is 'defined' in the database documentation as "The postal address > >of a contact related to the organisation". That can be anyone based in any > >location in the world, as Europol have discovered. > > Sounds like a definite problem to me! So lets fix that. Let's require > *at least* the REAL name and address of each member to be present in that > member's public WHOIS record. > > Every new member has to submit some identifying documents at the time they > first become members, right? If it is a corporation, then a copy of the > formal and legal incorporation document(s) must be submitted as part of the > application process. If it is person, then either a copy of that person's > passport or some other form of government-issued identification document > must be submitted as part of the new/prospective member's application for > membership, right? So we take this "real" member name & address info, > copy it off those bona fide documents, and stick the same data into the > member's public-facing WHOIS record. Is this just, like, too simple, > or what? > > > Hi Ronald, Thanks for your email, brother. ...i agree, you should be a bit fair with Denis :-/ You know, reducing your tone would not, imho, imply any loss in the value and strength of your arguments at all :-/ Having said the above, these [1,2,3,4,5] RIPE Lab articles provide, imho, interesting discussions, and very useful information, on topic... __ [1]: < https://labs.ripe.net/author/ad_castle/lessons-learned-from-ripe-when-creating-a-new-community-database-in-a-very-different-field/ > [2]: < https://labs.ripe.net/author/matt_parker/the-assisted-registry-check-let-us-help-you/ > [3]: < https://labs.ripe.net/author/athina/how-were-implementing-the-gdpr-legal-grounds-for-lawful-personal-data-processing-and-the-ripe-database/ > [4]: < https://labs.ripe.net/author/denis/review-of-database-consistency-service-dbconstat/ > [5]: < https://labs.ripe.net/author/denis/diff-functionality-in-the-ripe-database/> > > > As I have said, if there are natural person journalists, or activists, or > other folks who have other issues pertaining to lifestyle or whatever, and > who can make at least a prima facia case that they need to have both (a) > number resources AND also (b) privacy of their PII, then allow NCC to > accept their requests to be exempt from publication of their PII on a > case by case basis. For everybody else however, what you see (in the > public > WHOIS) is what you get, i.e. the real names and the real addresses. > > Problem solved! And everybody's happy. > > > At least my humble person will be! Many thanks for this alternative, i fully support. ...imho, a solution of a real problem shouldn't be implemented, if it removes the ability and solution that at least network operators (NO) actually have; and which allow them to freely and *privately* communicate each other...(home office addresses might be considered a distinct concern, though...). That kind of solutions would remove available, enventually *good*, solutions (new problems) and may contribute to more fragmentation within NO's community; amongst other possible consequences. https://labs.ripe.net/author/kranjbar/proposed-improvements-to-dummification-of-personal-data-in-the-ripe-database/#:~:text=It%20has%20been,exposed%20with%20no%20limits . https://labs.ripe.net/author/kranjbar/proposed-improvements-to-dummification-of-personal-data-in-the-ripe-database/#:~:text=The%20current%20dummification,the%20data%20protection%20rules . https://labs.ripe.net/author/kranjbar/proposed-improvements-to-dummification-of-personal-data-in-the-ripe-database/#:~:text=Proposed%20algorithm :,the%20objects%20below: https://labs.ripe.net/author/alexband/improving-the-management-of-ripe-database-objects-with-joint-responsibility/#:~:text=In%20the%20future,who%20query%20it . > > The only people who could be against this are people intent on committing > fraud or some other kind of nefarious skulduggery on the Internet WHILE > USING THEIR ASSIGNED NUMBER RESOURCES. > > > Ronald...this is not what drove my support to your proposed alternative :'-( ...and as said, above, imho you absolutely not need to use that kind of language to be heard, brother. Remain blessed, y'all! Shalom, --sb. > > >> So now, why don't you re-submit this proposal and instead propose that > *all* > >> mailing address information, including even the country name, be > redacted > >> from the data base for *all* members? > > > >It will be optional. > > Wait... WHAT??? > > Could you please repeat that? I want to make sure that even the people way > in the back heard that. > > So your -actual- proposal is to make *all* WHOIS information for *all* > classes > of RIPE members "optional"??? > > Take your time. If you misspoke, then by all means, please rephrase so as > clarify what you really meant to say. > > > Regards, > rfg > > -- > > [...] -- Best Regards ! __ baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure> Subscribe to Mailing List: <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/> __ #LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!» #MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement «Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20220622/72eaacf1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] 2022-01 New Version Policy Proposal (Personal Data in the RIPE Database)
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] 2022-01 V2 Resource Holders Address
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]