This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Bogon route object cleanup
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Bogon route object cleanup
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Cosmetic changes to the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Habicht
geier at geier.ne.tz
Fri Sep 3 08:46:35 CEST 2021
Hi all, I'd like to suggest keeping the first listed one : 192.31.196.0/24 - AS112 and removing the 2nd (192.88.99.0/24) and the last (2011:4188::/48). probably "reserved" is not the right status for 192.31.196.0/24 [rfc7535] and https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/iana-ipv4-special-registry.xhtml where the entry for 192.88.99.0/24 is much less favourable. https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml seems to suggest to keep 2001::/32 and 2002::/16 Regards, Frank On 03/09/2021 03:58, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wrote: > It seems that we never really settled the question of route objects that make > reference to the following reserved IP blocks. > > 192.31.196.0/24 > 192.88.99.0/24 > > 2001::/32 > 2002::/16 > 2011:4188::/48 > > Note that route objects referring to these IP blocks are *not* present in > the route registries of any RIR other than RIPE. > > I am in favor of including route objects that reference any of these > reserved blocks in the ongoing cleanup. My recollection is that Cynthia > Revstr�m also expressed support for including any and all such route > objects in the current ongoing route object cleanup. > > Are there any objections at the present time to including such route objects > in the ongoing cleanup? > > > Regards, > rfg >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Bogon route object cleanup
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Cosmetic changes to the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]