This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] Bogon route object cleanup

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] What do you think of our new UI?
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Bogon route object cleanup

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri Sep 3 02:58:36 CEST 2021

It seems that we never really settled the question of route objects that make
reference to the following reserved IP blocks.

192.31.196.0/24
192.88.99.0/24

2001::/32
2002::/16
2011:4188::/48

Note that route objects referring to these IP blocks are *not* present in
the route registries of any RIR other than RIPE.

I am in favor of including route objects that reference any of these
reserved blocks in the ongoing cleanup.  My recollection is that Cynthia
Revström also expressed support for including any and all such route
objects in the current ongoing route object cleanup.

Are there any objections at the present time to including such route objects
in the ongoing cleanup?


Regards,
rfg

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] What do you think of our new UI?
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Bogon route object cleanup

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]