[db-wg] Bogon cleanup -- Current anomalies

I just want to add a +1 for what Nick is saying here.
Also, it was terminated according to IANA over 6 years ago, so it is not
really a recent depreciation.

-Cynthia

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 5:54 PM Nick Hilliard via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net>
wrote:

> Gert Doering via db-wg wrote on 23/07/2021 14:54:
> > While Anycast 6to4 needs to die, it isn't fully dead yet.  So routes for
> > these two prefixes are legitimate.
>
> the discussion is whether it's appropriate for the RIPE NCC to continue
> to publish route objects for this prefix, which is a different
> discussion to the announcements in the dfz.
>
> The route objects are documentation of policy.  If the prefix isn't
> legitimate according to IANA or RIR allocations / assignments (and in
> this case, it definitely isn't), then the route object shouldn't be in
> the IRRDB.
>
> There's nothing stopping operators from continuing to announce the
> prefix.  It would be better if it were left to die, but this is
> ultimately a choice of each individual operator.
>
> The same argument applies to the route objects for 2002::/16.
>
> Nick
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20210724/69d20f80/attachment.html>