[db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10

Hi Cynthia,

Could you please elaborate on why the data is now invalid (what you think it is supposed to be, what it is now and what situation is causing it to be this way)? My understanding is that there was never a “proper” definition of the country field.

Matthias Merkel
Staclar, Inc.

From: db-wg <db-wg-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of Cynthia Revström via db-wg
Sent: Monday, 7 December 2020 14:04
To: DB-WG <db-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10

To clarify, when I said "messed up the data on my resources" I meant that the delegated file now has invalid data.
And invalid data that is supposed to be correct is a lot worse than incorrect data that is just provided by the resource holder.

- Cynthia


On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re<mailto:me at cynthia.re>> wrote:
Apologies if this email is a bit impolite.

From the start NWI-10 seemed like a pointless policy to me and just a policy that was made because the db-wg wanted to make more policies.

But as it has already messed up the data on my resources, I see it as a policy that messes up data and wastes time for no real advantage.

Hence I suggest that we revert NWI-10 unless someone actually has a good reason for why the legal address needs to match the delegated file, and how to implement it in a non-messy way.

- Cynthia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20201207/1252952f/attachment.html>