This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Mon Dec 7 14:03:34 CET 2020
To clarify, when I said "messed up the data on my resources" I meant that the delegated file now has invalid data. And invalid data that is supposed to be correct is a lot worse than incorrect data that is just provided by the resource holder. - Cynthia On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:58 PM Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re> wrote: > Apologies if this email is a bit impolite. > > From the start NWI-10 seemed like a pointless policy to me and just a > policy that was made because the db-wg wanted to make more policies. > > But as it has already messed up the data on my resources, I see it as a > policy that messes up data and wastes time for no real advantage. > > Hence I suggest that we revert NWI-10 unless someone actually has a good > reason for why the legal address needs to match the delegated file, and how > to implement it in a non-messy way. > > - Cynthia > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20201207/57449b25/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to revert NWI-10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]