This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Jul 29 01:27:04 CEST 2019
In message <20190728211022.GK60824 at Space.Net>, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: >On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:53:28PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette via db-wg wro=te: >> Just a point of curiosity... >> >> For each newly created ORG record that is put into the data base, if >> the ORG record represents something other than a natural person, does >> NCC staff make any effort to check to make sure that the alleged >> non-person entity actually exists, I mean, you know, as a legal entity, >> somewhere on planet earth? >>... > >I think this depends on the context that you want to *use* said org >object. If you put it in as a standalone and unreferenced database >object, I think no vetting takes place. > >If you want to tie resources to it that are maintained by the NCC >(allocations [PA] or end user assignments [PI]) this needs to go through >a NCC ticket, and they want to see paperwork. In the context of your response, would one or more ASNs count as "resources" which would trigger manditory vetting of the associated ORG? Or is it only the association of some IP address block that causes NCC to vet the ORG? Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] ORG record vetting ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]