[db-wg] abuse-c on legacy resources

Hi Nick

On 29/05/2015 14:47, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 29/05/2015 13:33, denis wrote:
>> I am not against policy change if that is the only way forward. But let me
>> just throw a quick question back at you. If someone manages (legacy)
>> resources and have customers using some of these resources and all this is
>> documented in the RIPE Database and one of those customers 'could' cause
>> abuse, does it not make sense to advertise an abuse contact? Isn't this
>> just good management of resources?
> in theory, advertising this is a good thing and won't do any harm.  In
> practice people will continue to use their old templates as before and
> won't bother changing things unless there's some impetus to do so.
>
> The LRH community is receptive to the idea of good stewardship of
> resources, so I don't see why they wouldn't be interested in mentioning
> legacy resources in the "Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database"
> document.

So are you suggesting that ripe-563 policy is amended to include legacy 
resources?

cheers
denis


>
> Nick
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20150529/8f1616d9/attachment.html>