<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <tt>Hi Nick</tt> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/05/2015 14:47, Nick Hilliard wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:55685FFC.1060807@inex.ie" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On 29/05/2015 13:33, denis wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I am not against policy change if that is the only way forward. But let me just throw a quick question back at you. If someone manages (legacy) resources and have customers using some of these resources and all this is documented in the RIPE Database and one of those customers 'could' cause abuse, does it not make sense to advertise an abuse contact? Isn't this just good management of resources? </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> in theory, advertising this is a good thing and won't do any harm. In practice people will continue to use their old templates as before and won't bother changing things unless there's some impetus to do so. The LRH community is receptive to the idea of good stewardship of resources, so I don't see why they wouldn't be interested in mentioning legacy resources in the "Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database" document.</pre> </blockquote> So are you suggesting that ripe-563 policy is amended to include legacy resources? cheers denis <blockquote cite="mid:55685FFC.1060807@inex.ie" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> Nick </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>