[db-wg] Temporary origins

> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:42:12AM +0200, Alex Band wrote:
>> I'm curious to hear from our Community about what they think about
>> this mode of operation; simply create the route object on the inetnum
>> holder's authorisation alone, inform the ASN holder that it was
>> created and only remove the object if they object. 
> 
> I support this direction and style of operation. The philosophy that
> an inetnum holder can unilaterally grant the right to announce a
> prefix to any ASN makes sense to me, probably is more intuitive to
> most.

folk seem to be gliding over the last clause in alex's paragraph.  are
you agreeing with it?

i think i am inclined to agree, given the use of peval(as-set:) to get
the transitive closure of a peer's prefixes.  but it makes me wonder
about my use of as-set:s.

randy