[db-wg] Temporary origins

On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:42:12AM +0200, Alex Band wrote:
> Thanks for sharing your experiences George. 
> 
> I'm curious to hear from our Community about what they think about
> this mode of operation; simply create the route object on the inetnum
> holder's authorisation alone, inform the ASN holder that it was
> created and only remove the object if they object. 
> 
> It would simplify the authorisation model tremendously and save a lot
> of frustration and customer support tickets. 
> 
> Seeing that APNIC has positive experiences, would our Community
> support such an approach considering the up and downsides?

I support this direction and style of operation. The philosophy that an
inetnum holder can unilaterally grant the right to announce a prefix to
any ASN makes sense to me, probably is more intuitive to most.

Kind regards,

Job