This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] History lost ...
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Edward Shryane
eshryane at ripe.net
Fri Feb 13 11:34:01 CET 2015
Dear colleagues, the versions feature is no longer in beta. You can query for the version history of a resource, a previous version of the object, and the difference between any two versions of an object. However, this feature does not list the version history for a deleted object, or for any versions before an object was re-created. If you have any questions for the RIPE NCC, please contact us. Regards Ed Shryane RIPE NCC > On 13 Feb 2015, at 01:54, Heather Schiller <heather.skanks at gmail.com> wrote: > > Have you looked at: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/kranjbar/proposal-to-display-history-of-objects-in-ripe-database <https://labs.ripe.net/Members/kranjbar/proposal-to-display-history-of-objects-in-ripe-database> Not sure if this is still in Beta? > > I don't know the the process or policy of each RIR and am more familiar with ARIN. ARIN does not get rid of historical information. They keep the records and make the information available through a service called WhoWas. https://www.arin.net/resources/whowas/index.html <https://www.arin.net/resources/whowas/index.html> > > --Heather > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:38 PM, William Sylvester <william.sylvester at addrex.net <mailto:william.sylvester at addrex.net>> wrote: > Hi, > > I support this and also was wondering about associated objects like routing objects and in-addrs? This is also an issue for claiming an old block where a locked maintainer was used. It would be nice to have the unlocked maintainer apply for objects related to the block not just the inetnum for example. > > Thanks, > Billy > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com <mailto:ebais at a2b-internet.com>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> With the IP transfers going in full swing, it is quite common these days that the larger prefix size is broken up in to multiple smaller prefixes.. >> >> >> >> As the original prefix is split up, the IPRA’s remove the original prefix from the database .. and with it .. the history … >> >> >> >> Is there a way to preserve that data to be able to still lookup the data using –list-versions or –show-version # … >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Erik Bais >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20150213/a6125734/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 235 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20150213/a6125734/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] History lost ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]