This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] DB documentation?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marco d'Itri md at Linux.IT
Sat Oct 19 18:06:37 CEST 2013

On Oct 08, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> (But I've said this before :-) - I do not see it as a useful excercise 
> having to create an organization: object for the sole purpose of being 
> able to have a different abuse-c: for some inet(6)num object)
Agreed.
I am not sure about who actually disagrees with this among operators.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20131019/d323e1e6/attachment.sig>

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] DB documentation?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]