[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum

Hi,

On 10/10/13 5:50 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * Gert Doering <gert at space.net> [2013-10-08 13:33]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:00:28PM +0200, Gilles Massen wrote:
>>> Something else in mind: as before: allow abuse-c for inet*num. Prefer
>>
>> This.
>>
>> (But I've said this before :-) - I do not see it as a useful excercise
>> having to create an organization: object for the sole purpose of being
>> able to have a different abuse-c: for some inet(6)num object)
>
> ++++++1

I think that having the abuse-c role linked to the org object was a 
great idea. I also understand that some organisation may want to have 
different abuse contacts/roles defined for different IP blocks.

One way on how this could be fixed, in my opinion, is by allowing an 
abuse-c role to be referenced in the inet*num object (but only if the 
inet*num object references an org that already has an abuse-c role 
referenced).
In this case, the general abuse-c would be the one referenced in the org 
and the 'local' abuse-c would be the role referenced in the inet*num object.

cheers,
elvis