This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Meet Debbie, the RIPE Database Robot!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed Sep 19 21:16:14 CEST 2012
On 19.09.2012 20:58, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > Language tags has always been, and still are the source of conflicts > in standard organisations (ISO and IETF etc.) > > As an aside (I am ignorant with that regard), I have seen language encodings > being widely used that look like PT_PT or PT_BR. Difference or applicability? > > As far as I remember PT_PT stands for Portugees as spoken in Portugal while > PT-BR denotes the Brazailian variant. So one sees American English, UK > english etc. And so on, and so on, and so on - e.g.: de: General German de-de: German German de-at: Austrian German de-ch: Swiss German de-li: Liechtenstein German de-lu: Luxemburgian German de-nl: Dutch German ;-) Have a look at the language prefs of your browser of choice. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Meet Debbie, the RIPE Database Robot!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]