This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jaap Akkerhuis jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Sep 19 20:58:49 CEST 2012

Language tags has always been, and still are the source of conflicts
in standard organisations (ISO and IETF etc.)
    
    As an aside (I am ignorant with that regard), I have seen language encodings
    being widely used that look like PT_PT or PT_BR. Difference or applicability?

As far as I remember PT_PT stands for Portugees as spoken in Portugal while
PT-BR denotes the Brazailian variant. So one sees American English, UK
english etc.

	jaap

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]