AW: [db-wg] Adding route objects

On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:

> On Apr 05, Winfried Haug <wh at germany.com> wrote:
>
>>> I would even argue that the WG should consider allowing whoever controls
>>> mnt-routes OR the referenced aut-num object to remove (not create) a
>>> route/route6 object even if the request is not authenticated by both
>>> maintainers.
>> this would not help in our case and i assume many ISPs might have the
>> same scenario.
> Yes, I understand this and I support your proposal.
> What I am proposing is an additional change to solve the second part of
> the problem (how to remove old route objects when the old ISP is not
> cooperating).



Well, if the maintainer of the inetnum, and the maintainer of the
origin-as for the to-be-registered-route-object agree and can send
a pgp-signed, or whatever auth they use, object to ripedb, it 
should be registered, either with a warning stating there already
exists a route-object, (which actually would be better for customers
that are changing isp's since the filters for their coming global
transit would work directly), or that the existing route-object
simply is removed and the new one installed,

I would prefer to be able to have multiple route-objects
(as was possible earlier in ripedb), and to manually clean
the database when customers sucessfully have changed global
transit.


>
>

-- 

Best regards

 	/Fredrik

-------------------------------------------------------
KTHNOC, KTH, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden +46 8 790 65 17
-------------------------------------------------------