AW: [db-wg] Adding route objects

On Apr 05, Winfried Haug <wh at germany.com> wrote:

> > I would even argue that the WG should consider allowing whoever controls
> > mnt-routes OR the referenced aut-num object to remove (not create) a
> > route/route6 object even if the request is not authenticated by both
> > maintainers.
> this would not help in our case and i assume many ISPs might have the
> same scenario.
Yes, I understand this and I support your proposal.
What I am proposing is an additional change to solve the second part of
the problem (how to remove old route objects when the old ISP is not
cooperating).

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20060406/0233896d/attachment.sig>