This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Wed Feb 16 21:14:30 CET 2005

On 16 Feb 2005, at 17:39, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote:

> In my opinion this aproach is wrong. an inetnum or route does not have 
> an email or even read emails. There is *someone* there handling abuse, 
> who has an email (maybe designated for abuse) that is reading malis 
> and hopefully doing something. What do I miss here.

On 6 May 2004, at 11:39, Niall O'Reilly wrote:

> Making the _same_ distinguished attribute available in both primary
> (inet*num, AS) and secondary (reference-targets: person, role, org, 
> irt) objects
> gives the widest scope for maintainers to do what is _convenient for 
> them_ whilst
> retaining overall consistency.


Best regards,

Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin Computing Services

PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]