This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Streater
tim.streater at dante.org.uk
Fri Jan 30 11:42:45 CET 2004
At 10:05 30/01/2004, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: >MarcoH wrote: >>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: >> >>>>'remarks: complaints to abuse@' also seem to scale to >10% of the inetnum >>>>objects. >>> >>>from am management level it seems so. But given the fact we are discussing it, it does not scale for the tool-writers. >>> >>>if i am wring, what is the discussion about? >> >>The fact remarks is a generic name and the field is freeform > >and therefore it does not scale? right? Remarks/comments fields should never be relied upon by anyone except the person entering the comments. -- Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]