[db-wg] abuse-c

MarcoH <mailto:marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:14:13PM +0100, Christian Rasmussen wrote:
>> Hi Marco,
>> 
>> 
>> Okay, I think I now understand better what you mean. There are
>> different levels of check of entered abuse address:
>> 
>> 1. Nothing
>> 2. Syntax check
>> 3. Address validity check (as previously described)
>> 4. Response time check
> 
> level 4 would be to run random audits on the information present in
> the database.
> 

Last time I misfilled an inetnum abuse with a mnt-lower ( yes I did :( ). as
my email was present in changed: they complained a lot to everybody even in
the "upper block" including me that abuse email was wrong. 

My idea is if internet user follow the RFC and their common erratic sense
(i.e. complaining to the "upper authority" if no response from the implied
inetnum) and we all read our emails, everything  should be fine. 

I think internet users are really are our best low cost efficient auditing
system, and we might listen to them. If you want to pay for something that
is free though ... well it is no matter to me. 

--
Julien Tayon    LDCOM networks
BU DATA- +33 1 70 18  14 45 
1 square Chaptal , 92309 Levallois Cedex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040113/06d16828/attachment.html>