[db-wg] abuse-c

Christian Rasmussen <mailto:chr at jay.net> wrote:
Hi Christian, 

>> 
>> I'd also like to see a mandatory/multiple abuse-c field containing a
>> rfc-valid email address.
> 
> Im not sure why it should be multiple? But I think most of us on this
> list can agree with you that a valid abuse email address associated
> with each inetnum in the database would be very welcome.
>From what I have seen so far I would need:

abuse: copyright.infringement at ourdomain   // spam from some people 
abuse: system.attack at ourdomain  // DoS, portscan ....
abuse: spam at ourdomain   
abuse: legal at ourdomain // For cybersquatting, legal procedure

But I am not sure the problem is only technic I see it partly as a matter of
usage : 
if we where behaving the same even putting the abuse in remarks, desc or
whatever the field is, people would get used to it, and they would stop
writing to all address. 


Regards,

--
Julien Tayon    LDCOM networks
BU DATA- +33 1 70 18  14 45 
1 square Chaptal , 92309 Levallois Cedex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040113/b78b002d/attachment.html>