This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Fri Feb 6 16:31:27 CET 2004

>> we might consider to also extend irt with the abuse-mailbox and
>> allow abuse-c to refer to an irt object ?
>
>why not remove irt entirely?  it is not needed given this proposal.

  Sorry, I have to disagree.
  The abuse / abuse-c /abuse-mailbox proposal(s) as being discussed will
  (maybe - maybe not) solve a different problem...

>"less is more."  -- mies van der rohe

  and nothing is best?

>randy

  Wilfried.

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]