This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Fri Feb 6 17:22:46 CET 2004
> > We aim to make it easy for everyone; the following should be nearly > > enough. > > > > whois -h whois.ripe.net 137.43.0.0 | \ > > awk '/^abuse-mailbox:/ {print $2}' On 06.02 17:08, Peter Koch wrote: > So, why do you believe "they"'re going to change their attitude? First of > all this ssemms to be an issue of the presentation format. One could have > a cleaner db design with abuse-c-handle and still show it in the form > suggested above. give them a chance... maybe 50% (I'm an optimist) of misplaced reportsa will disappear. for the others, you can still tell your colleagues just to drop it, or sent back a mail "read the abuse-email: contact, asshole"... > An even easier solution would be a dedicated server: > > whois -h abuse.ripe.net 137.43.0.0 and you will think "they" would ever use THIS? I thought we are talking about efficient solution, not an easy one ;-) P.S. Yes, I think abuse-email: should be right name for the attribute... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. He who laughs last thinks slowest.
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]