This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Final Minutes for DB WG at RIPE 41
- Previous message (by thread): Final Minutes for DB WG at RIPE 41
- Next message (by thread): Final Minutes for DB WG at RIPE 41
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrei Robachevsky
andrei at ripe.net
Tue Jul 23 10:03:41 CEST 2002
Hi Ping, Lu, Ping wrote: > Hi, Nigel, > > About {AP-41.8 C&W] > >> [AP-41.2 C&W] To send their proposal to allow referencing external >> objects in the DB to the mailing list for discussion. >> Ongoing, no action yet > > We made a proposal to allow "import: from SRC::ASN:AS-SET" for using data > from other source of registry data. I haven't seen any formal response from > RIPE NCC yet. This shouldn't affect the database referential integrity but > will make RR closer to a distributed structure. Maybe the status is now > "Complete, pending response from RIPE NCC" ? Agreed ? I probably miss some of your e-mails but I haven't seen a proposal regarding this issue. Are you referring to the discussion on irrtoolset mailing list where you mentioned that such feature may be desirable? I think in order to start a discussion we need to elaborate on this. Especially regarding the scope (I am in favour to limit is to import/export only) and functionality (how/where expansion is done, etc.). If you would like we can prepare such proposal. From the database changes will be minimal, most of the work will happen in the IRRToolset. Thanks, Andrei Robachevsky
- Previous message (by thread): Final Minutes for DB WG at RIPE 41
- Next message (by thread): Final Minutes for DB WG at RIPE 41
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]