Antwort: Re: Deletion of .de domain objects

Hello,

On 29.06.00 17:40 Sebastian Willing <s.willing at mops.net> wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 02:38:12PM +0200, Thorsten Schreiner wrote:
> > > I think they want to become a BIG player... but actually can't right
> >
> > I cannot understand why the DENIC doesn't help funding with one 
central ripe
> > database instead of setting up a own system. The usability and work of 
the
> > ripe database was the best database ever, with automated robot for 
updates
> > within minutes and a very good maintainer scheme.
> The RIPE didn't want to serve the .de-namespace for free any longer and 
it
> seems that the DeNic didn't want to pay for the services.
> I agree that the better solution would have been to pay the RIPE for 
service.

That was not an option we have as I tried to explain in another email. 

> >
> > In the meanwhile we have Handles with the same key XYZ-RIPE, with 
different
> > contents in RIPE-db and DeNIC-db (not only the missing remarks, but 
also
> > phone and fax, and if someone makes changes to one of the two handles 
the
> > other will keep the old data).

No they are currently mirrored but we are not allowed to publish these 
data.

> ....and what if a handle is deleted from one DB but not from the other? 
Once
> the handle # is re-assigned, the owner of a domain depends on the server 
you
> ask.

The owner of the domain is the one stored in the DENIC database.

Sabine

> I think, the best thing is to restore the deleted records from RIPE 
backups 
and
> to remove the referer to the DeNic-whois-server until either the DeNic 
is 
paying
> or is running a workable service (maybe with references to the 
RIPE-whois-server
> for persons).
> Yours,
> S.Willing
> 
> 
Sabine  Dolderer 
DENIC eG
Wiesenhüttenplatz 26
D-60329 Frankfurt

eMail: Sabine.Dolderer at denic.de
Fon: +49 69 27235 0
Fax: +49 69 27235 235