This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [cooperation-wg-chairs] Cooperation WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jan 5 15:18:50 CET 2021
> On 5 Jan 2021, at 13:37, Michael J. Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote: > > When considering who to cast your vote for, my suggestion is to think of whose background and experience best compliments Julf and Achilleas'. I can think of no better way to assess. Indeed. But even then it is hard to choose. Both Des and Dick are excellent, well qualified candidates: equally good choices, albeit in different ways. I can’t pick between them. So I support both Dick and Des. FWIW we had a similar dilemma in the IoT WG last year: two strong and equally matched candidates for one vacancy. > Do any others feel similarly? Yes. Though *please* remember this is RIPE takes decisions by consensus. We don’t vote. And you can express support for more than one candidate. IMO it’s very likely someone will end up tossing a coin to make the selection.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [cooperation-wg-chairs] Cooperation WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WG Chair Selection Process - candidates and launch of the discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]