[cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT

> On 16 Feb 2017, at 15:22, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Anyway while I think outreach and "enhanced cooperation”  by NCC can be a good thing I also think that transparency is important to maintain the trust of the community. I believe more reporting of the detail of meetings and contacts between NCC and LEAs and regulators would be helpful.
> 
> For starters, I might ask if there will be reports on the recent Round Table in Brussels and on NCC’s involvement with the European Parliament’s EIF? (Sorry Chris!)

Not at all, Gordon, and a useful reminder to share with this group a link to the report from our recent Roundtable Meeting: 
https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/about-ripe-ncc-and-ripe/ripe-ncc-holds-meeting-for-governments-and-regulators

(The report includes a link to presentations given on the day, and the discussion mentioned in my earlier email about Belgian IPv6 adoption sprang from RIPE NCC report and its section on IPv6 adoption trends). 

Cheers
Chris