This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 15:22:02 CET 2017
It is funny how things progress. Not that long ago we had various LEAs complaining about IPv6. Google << IPv6 FBI >> for examples, including this: "The FBI, DEA, and Royal Canadian Mounted Police say IPv6 may erode their ability to trace Internet addresses -- and warn new laws may be necessary if industry doesn't do more." https://www.cnet.com/news/fbi-dea-warn-ipv6-could-shield-criminals-from-police/ Anyway while I think outreach and "enhanced cooperation” by NCC can be a good thing I also think that transparency is important to maintain the trust of the community. I believe more reporting of the detail of meetings and contacts between NCC and LEAs and regulators would be helpful. For starters, I might ask if there will be reports on the recent Round Table in Brussels and on NCC’s involvement with the European Parliament’s EIF? (Sorry Chris!) Gordon
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]