This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at frobbit.se
Wed May 25 15:27:47 CEST 2016
On 25 May 2016, at 15:25, Johan Helsingius wrote: > On 25-05-16 15:15, Patrik Fältström wrote: >> Although of course it is good if we also have consensus. > > Just to clarify - there was definitely a reason I put all those modifiers in the phrase "possibly try to see if there is a > consensus view". I don't see it as the job of the WG or the > co-chairs to force a single shared view - only to articulate a common view in case there is one. We completely agree!!! Again! :-D Patrik -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 203 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20160525/ba0bcdfa/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]