This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Johan Helsingius
julf at julf.com
Wed May 25 15:25:04 CEST 2016
On 25-05-16 15:15, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Although of course it is good if we also have consensus.
Just to clarify - there was definitely a reason I put all those
modifiers in the phrase "possibly try to see if there is a
consensus view". I don't see it as the job of the WG or the
co-chairs to force a single shared view - only to articulate
a common view in case there is one.
Julf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20160525/d6ee48e6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Chairs of this wg
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]