This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Sep 22 11:46:23 CEST 2014
On 22 Sep 2014, at 10:34, Roland Perry <roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote: > If so, then the IANA table should be clearly annotated so that people know that the "Designation" for these non-RIR legacy entries is the name of the organisation that the allocation was *originally* made to. That just provides other sticks: "what happened to 16/8 after DEC died?", "why is Stanford University listed as holding 28/8 when it no longer uses that space?", "when will MIT hand back 18/8?" etc, etc.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]