This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Mon Sep 22 11:34:46 CEST 2014
In message <CAD_dc6isOZncJVGsogVDOHaF6y=GOSyOUgoJNfxQ+NWeY+AGJA at mail.gmail.com>, at 10:11:44 on Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> writes >>The only service IANA needs to provide here is updating a very small >>number of entries comprising the /8 allocation records, when the need >>arises. > >I think the point here is that IANA no longer assign to orgs(and >somewhat transferred initial legacy spaces maintenance to RIR) and >since they now only assign to RIRs the records already reflects the >relevant assignments. If there is any regular update that is required, >it will/should be at the RIR level because there is apparently no major >changes that will happen at /8 level. If so, then the IANA table should be clearly annotated so that people know that the "Designation" for these non-RIR legacy entries is the name of the organisation that the allocation was *originally* made to. Although because 51/8 has been updated to say "UK Government Department for Work and Pensions", that isn't actually true. -- Roland Perry
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] publication of data about legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]