[cooperation-wg] Request for clarification of the process

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:

> Thanks for this.
>
> So, to be clear, the proposal is that RIPE NCC will not prepare a specific
> response to the ICG RFP, rather it will delegate to CRISP the task of
> preparing a draft response.
>

Same with the AFRINIC region and i think will applies to other RIRs

>
> The draft prepared by CRISP will be posted to this mailing list for
> discussion and comments.
>
> Is that correct?
>
> This is also how i understood it. However i would expect that mailing list
to be the NRO list which is more global. Although noting prevents
cross-posting.


> If yes, then I would propose that RIPE NCC request CRISP to take into
> account, when preparing the draft response, all the comments that have been
> posted to date to this mailing list.
>
> Well if you ask me i did say that no major specific discussion/proposal
has really happened ;) also it can be unrealistic to task a team yet to be
formed to look at previous comments. While they may do that, i think when
the team get formed, the 2 RIPE members should find a way of collecting
comments from its region as same will be done in other regions as well.

Cheers!


> Thanks and best,
> Richard
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Buckridge [mailto:chrisb at ripe.net]
> > Sent: mercredi, 22. octobre 2014 09:40
> > To: rhill at hill-a.ch
> > Cc: Hans Petter Holen; cooperation-wg at ripe.net
> > Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] Request for clarification of the process
> >
> >
> > Dear Richard, all,
> >
> > Attempting a more specific answer to that question:
> >
> > According to the existing proposal [which should not be regarded
> > as final], the RIPE community will not prepare a specific
> > response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) produced by the IANA
> > Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG).
> >
> > [The RFP text is available at:
> > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rfp-iana-stewardship-0
> > 8sep14-en.pdf]
> >
> > The current "draft proposal" takes the approach of a higher-level
> > RIPE community position, specifying the mechanism that the
> > community wishes to see replace the existing NTIA agreement. The
> > current APNIC community draft proposal is based on a similar approach.
> >
> > To avoid confusion, it may make more sense to refer to this
> > document as a draft set of principles, but it is anticipated that
> > this text will be the output of the RIPE community discussion.
> >
> > The ICG RFP lays out a very specific template for the proposals
> > that the ICG expects to receive, and the CRISP team can be
> > expected to produce a proposal based on this template. There is
> > no requirement that the individual RIR communities use this
> > template, and consolidating five lengthy, detailed proposals (as
> > the RFP template would produce) may pose more of a challenge for
> > the CRISP team than drawing together five expressions of
> > priorities and preferred mechanisms to develop a single proposal,
> > based on the RFP template.
> >
> > As always, all of the assumptions here are open for discussion in
> > this working group.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > On 22 Oct 2014, at 16:31, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Hans Petter,
> > >
> > > Thank you for this, it is helpful.
> > >
> > > But the links you provide refer to the NRO process, whereas my
> > question was specifically about the RIPE NCC process.  That is,
> > what process will RIPE NCC use to prepare its input to CRISP.
> > >
> > > Thanks again and best,
> > > Richard
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net
> [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net]On Behalf Of Hans Petter Holen
> > Sent: mercredi, 22. octobre 2014 01:42
> > To: cooperation-wg at ripe.net
> > Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] Request for clarification of the process
> >
> > On 20.10.14 21:37, Richard Hill wrote:
> >> So my question is actually "What process will be used by RIPE to prepare
> a
> >> response to the ICG's RFP?  Will that response be drafted by the RIPE
> NCC
> >> staff?  And will it be posted to this list for comment before it is
> >> submitted to CRIP?"
> >>
> > I think some of the answer may be found in
> >
>
> https://www.nro.net/news/iana-stewardship-consolidated-rir-iana-stewardship-
> proposal-team
> >
> > and on
> >
> >
>
> https://www.nro.net/nro-and-internet-governance/iana-oversight/consolidated-
> rir-iana-stewardship-proposal-team-crisp-team
> >
> > It does say community members and staff - so I do not read that only
> staff
> will be involved.
> >
> > I also read that the work will be done on a public mailing-list and that
> the meetings will be open.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hans Petter Holen
> > Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 |
> > hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20141022/8a0aae11/attachment.html>