<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Richard Hill <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rhill@hill-a.ch" target="_blank">rhill@hill-a.ch</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks for this.<br>
<br>
So, to be clear, the proposal is that RIPE NCC will not prepare a specific<br>
response to the ICG RFP, rather it will delegate to CRISP the task of<br>
preparing a draft response.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Same with the AFRINIC region and i think will applies to other RIRs<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
The draft prepared by CRISP will be posted to this mailing list for<br>
discussion and comments.<br>
<br>
Is that correct?<br>
<br></blockquote><div>This is also how i understood it. However i would expect that mailing list to be the NRO list which is more global. Although noting prevents cross-posting.<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If yes, then I would propose that RIPE NCC request CRISP to take into<br>
account, when preparing the draft response, all the comments that have been<br>
posted to date to this mailing list.<br>
<br></blockquote><div>Well if you ask me i did say that no major specific discussion/proposal has really happened ;) also it can be unrealistic to task a team yet to be formed to look at previous comments. While they may do that, i think when the team get formed, the 2 RIPE members should find a way of collecting comments from its region as same will be done in other regions as well.<br><br></div><div>Cheers!<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Thanks and best,<br>
Richard<br>
<span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: Chris Buckridge [mailto:<a href="mailto:chrisb@ripe.net">chrisb@ripe.net</a>]<br>
> Sent: mercredi, 22. octobre 2014 09:40<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:rhill@hill-a.ch">rhill@hill-a.ch</a><br>
> Cc: Hans Petter Holen; <a href="mailto:cooperation-wg@ripe.net">cooperation-wg@ripe.net</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] Request for clarification of the process<br>
><br>
><br>
</span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> Dear Richard, all,<br>
><br>
> Attempting a more specific answer to that question:<br>
><br>
> According to the existing proposal [which should not be regarded<br>
> as final], the RIPE community will not prepare a specific<br>
> response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) produced by the IANA<br>
> Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG).<br>
><br>
> [The RFP text is available at:<br>
> <a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rfp-iana-stewardship-0" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rfp-iana-stewardship-0</a><br>
> 8sep14-en.pdf]<br>
><br>
> The current "draft proposal" takes the approach of a higher-level<br>
> RIPE community position, specifying the mechanism that the<br>
> community wishes to see replace the existing NTIA agreement. The<br>
> current APNIC community draft proposal is based on a similar approach.<br>
><br>
> To avoid confusion, it may make more sense to refer to this<br>
> document as a draft set of principles, but it is anticipated that<br>
> this text will be the output of the RIPE community discussion.<br>
><br>
> The ICG RFP lays out a very specific template for the proposals<br>
> that the ICG expects to receive, and the CRISP team can be<br>
> expected to produce a proposal based on this template. There is<br>
> no requirement that the individual RIR communities use this<br>
> template, and consolidating five lengthy, detailed proposals (as<br>
> the RFP template would produce) may pose more of a challenge for<br>
> the CRISP team than drawing together five expressions of<br>
> priorities and preferred mechanisms to develop a single proposal,<br>
> based on the RFP template.<br>
><br>
> As always, all of the assumptions here are open for discussion in<br>
> this working group.<br>
><br>
> Best regards,<br>
> Chris<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 22 Oct 2014, at 16:31, Richard Hill <<a href="mailto:rhill@hill-a.ch">rhill@hill-a.ch</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Dear Hans Petter,<br>
> ><br>
> > Thank you for this, it is helpful.<br>
> ><br>
> > But the links you provide refer to the NRO process, whereas my<br>
> question was specifically about the RIPE NCC process. That is,<br>
> what process will RIPE NCC use to prepare its input to CRISP.<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks again and best,<br>
> > Richard<br>
> > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > From: <a href="mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces@ripe.net">cooperation-wg-bounces@ripe.net</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces@ripe.net">cooperation-wg-bounces@ripe.net</a>]On Behalf Of Hans Petter Holen<br>
> Sent: mercredi, 22. octobre 2014 01:42<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:cooperation-wg@ripe.net">cooperation-wg@ripe.net</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] Request for clarification of the process<br>
><br>
> On 20.10.14 21:37, Richard Hill wrote:<br>
>> So my question is actually "What process will be used by RIPE to prepare<br>
a<br>
>> response to the ICG's RFP? Will that response be drafted by the RIPE NCC<br>
>> staff? And will it be posted to this list for comment before it is<br>
>> submitted to CRIP?"<br>
>><br>
> I think some of the answer may be found in<br>
><br>
<a href="https://www.nro.net/news/iana-stewardship-consolidated-rir-iana-stewardship-
proposal-team" target="_blank">https://www.nro.net/news/iana-stewardship-consolidated-rir-iana-stewardship-<br>
proposal-team</a><br>
><br>
> and on<br>
><br>
><br>
<a href="https://www.nro.net/nro-and-internet-governance/iana-oversight/consolidated-
rir-iana-stewardship-proposal-team-crisp-team" target="_blank">https://www.nro.net/nro-and-internet-governance/iana-oversight/consolidated-<br>
rir-iana-stewardship-proposal-team-crisp-team</a><br>
><br>
> It does say community members and staff - so I do not read that only staff<br>
will be involved.<br>
><br>
> I also read that the work will be done on a public mailing-list and that<br>
the meetings will be open.<br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Hans Petter Holen<br>
> Mobile <a href="tel:%2B47%2045%2006%2060%2054" value="+4745066054">+47 45 06 60 54</a> |<br>
> <a href="mailto:hph@oslo.net">hph@oslo.net</a> | <a href="http://hph.oslo.net" target="_blank">http://hph.oslo.net</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><font color="#888888"><blockquote style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;font-family:garamond,serif">
<i><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Seun Ojedeji,<br style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Federal University Oye-Ekiti<br style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">web: </span><a href="http://www.fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">http://www.fuoye.edu.ng</a><br>
<span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Mobile: <a value="+2348035233535">+2348035233535</a></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><br></i><i><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">alt email:<a href="http://goog_1872880453" target="_blank"> </a><a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng</a></span></i><br><br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The key to understanding is humility - my view !<br></blockquote></blockquote></font><br></div>
</div></div>