This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [connect-bof] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Barnes
rlb at ipv.sx
Wed Nov 6 22:30:52 CET 2013
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > On 6 Nov 2013, at 17:04, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote: > > > On 06/11/2013 17:03, Richard Barnes wrote: > >> One thing to keep in mind: This document does not yet have IETF > consensus. > >> In fact, opinions I've heard are pretty varied. > > > > yes, have they been adequately addressed by the author? > > I'm not sure if there's consensus on that. :-) Before this gets too meta... the document has passed IETF last call, and I believe is currently in the process of resolving comments. --Richard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20131106/8f19ebc0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] [connect-bof] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]