This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Nov 6 20:01:32 CET 2013
On 6 Nov 2013, at 17:04, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote: > On 06/11/2013 17:03, Richard Barnes wrote: >> One thing to keep in mind: This document does not yet have IETF consensus. >> In fact, opinions I've heard are pretty varied. > > yes, have they been adequately addressed by the author? I'm not sure if there's consensus on that. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] On Consensus and Humming in the IETF
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]