This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthew Ford
ford at isoc.org
Fri Aug 3 17:56:02 CEST 2012
Hi Jim, On 3 Aug 2012, at 02:18, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > On 3 Aug 2012, at 09:49, Dmitry Burkov wrote: > >> But there are more even more dangerous contributions - I recommend to read full lists of them > > Hi Dima. For those of us who are too busy or (like me, too lazy) to read them all, could you please point us at the more dangerous ones? The contributions are not organised in a way which makes is easy to browse or search them. > This may be of interest: https://fileshare.tools.isoc.org/wentworth/public/WCIT%20issues%20matrix/WCIT-ISSUES-MATRIX-15June2012.pdf Mat
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]