[cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?

As I am still on the run - I can answer at this moment only using abbreviations and without links - among key problems are CLI reqs, CPP principles and OTT issues which also were raised. It could be dangerous when Internet services or Internet termination service are included in definition of international telecommunications services. But it is like double-side sword - any actions against e2e can be identified as illegal and follow to trade sanctions.

More detailed about was mentioned in excellent publications of Jeff in IPJ and through ISOC and also were raised by Patrick

Sent from my iPhone

On 03.08.2012, at 13:18, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:

> On 3 Aug 2012, at 09:49, Dmitry Burkov wrote:
> 
>> But there are more even more dangerous contributions - I recommend to read full lists of them
> 
> Hi Dima. For those of us who are too busy or (like me, too lazy) to read them all, could you please point us at the more dangerous ones? The contributions are not organised in a way which makes is easy to browse or search them.
>